Discuss a case study of prevention and disruption in relation to a specific terrorist or organized crime problem.

Order Description
Please kindly
a) Choose one case study of a particular crime type and apply one crime prevention paradigm
b) Choose one case study of a particular crime type and compare more than one crime prevention paradigm
c) Critique an existing prevention/disruption policy approach that exists in real life.
The key is not to choose a very general or generic crime time. So, on the one hand – don’t choose Human Trafficking in general because you are making it far too
difficult for yourself to show off your analytical skills. On the other hand – don’t choose Human Trafficking for the Purposes of Sexual Exploitation from (enter tiny
town where no research evidence or literature exists). What I’m really looking for is evidence to show that you can analytically apply the concepts and theories from
the module to a specific crime problem or policy. The emphasis isn’t really on how much knowledge you give me about the crime problem, or the theory but on the
application of the theory to understanding disruption/prevention. The emphasis is on how you apply that analytical knowledge to the complexities of preventing and
disrupting crime.
It is perfectly acceptable to only use newspaper sources to describe your crime
Can you use maps/figures/illustrations? The main thing to consider is relevance. If it adds to your argument or conveys information in a neat way, then yes go for it.
If it is just filler or obscure then don’t. Last year, a strange number of essays would do things like ‘I’ve chosen group X, from country Y. Figure 1 is a map of
country Y’. And the picture had no relevance at all. Yeah, avoid that type of thing.
You can use any referencing style so long as it is used consistently and accurately.
No need for abstract.
The instruction above will once again listed in a world file attached.