Eschatology Chart and Essay

This is the “Chart” But you might need to go to the link blow to see the full Chart.

Eschatology Chart

Eschatological View    Brief Explanation of View (2-3 Sentences)    Critique – State Your Position on the View (2-3 Sentences)
Biblical Passages to Support Position
Futurist Eschatology

Inaugurated
Eschatology

Realized Eschatology

Demythologization of Eschatology

Eschatology and Theology of Hope

Eschatology and Ethics

Dispensationalist Eschatology

Please follow the ‘Information blow. To get to the Chart there is a link blow.
Please do the essay as outline and answer all question. Please follow the “grading Rubric” to have a very good grade. Thanks
Eschatology Chart and Essay

View Rubric
Due Date: Jul 26, 2015 23:59:59       Max Points: 90

Details:
Carefully read the following to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Access and complete the “Eschatology Chart.” Complete the chart according to the instructions provided in the chart resource.
Write an essay of 750-850 words that explains the significance of eschatology:
1.    Define and explain eschatology.
2.    Define and explain the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.
3.    Focus on one view of eschatology as covered in the textbook. Thoroughly explain the selected view.
4.    Support your position by referencing three to five academic resources, preferably from the GCU Library, including the Bible and the textbook. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Prepare this assignment submission as one Word document by copying and pasting the completed chart into your essay document following the References section.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
HTH359.R.EschatologyChart_3-31-14.doc

Follow this Rubric for a very good “Grade” .Thanks

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%     2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%     3
Satisfactory
75.00%     4
Good
85.00%     5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Define and explain eschatology.    Essay fails to define and explain eschatology.    Essay superficially defines and explains eschatology, lacks scholarly sources, biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay minimally defines and explains eschatology using some scholarly sources, but lacks biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay adequately defines and explains eschatology using some scholarly sources, appropriate biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay comprehensively defines and explains eschatology using relevant scholarly sources, appropriate biblical passages, and careful consideration of the readings.
30.0 % Define and explain the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.    Essay fails to provide a definition and explanation of the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.    Essay superficially defines and explains the theology of hope, but lacks examples to support definition.    Essay minimally defines and explains theology of hope citing only some examples to support definition.    Essay adequately defines and explains the theology of hope citing some examples to support definition.    Essay comprehensively defines and explains the theology of hope citing many appropriate and relevant examples to support definition.
30.0 % Explain one view of eschatology as covered in the textbook.    Essay fails to identify the view of eschatology covered in the textbook.    Essay superficially identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook, but lacks citations to support findings. Less than satisfactory explanation of the view is provided.    Essay minimally identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with some citations to support findings. Limited explanation of the view is provided.    Essay adequately identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with some accurate and relevant citations to support findings. Good explanation of the view is provided.    Essay extensively identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with many accurate and relevant citations to support findings. Thorough explanation of the view is provided.
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
6.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.    Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.    Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.    Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
6.0 % Argument Logic and Construction    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3.0 %Format
1.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.    All format elements are correct.
2.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)    No reference page is included. No citations are used. Less than three academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Less than three academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.    In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.
100 % Total Weightage

Eschatology Chart and Essay

This is the “Chart” But you might need to go to the link blow to see the full Chart.

Eschatology Chart

Eschatological View    Brief Explanation of View (2-3 Sentences)    Critique – State Your Position on the View (2-3 Sentences)
Biblical Passages to Support Position
Futurist Eschatology

Inaugurated
Eschatology

Realized Eschatology

Demythologization of Eschatology

Eschatology and Theology of Hope

Eschatology and Ethics

Dispensationalist Eschatology

Please follow the ‘Information blow. To get to the Chart there is a link blow.
Please do the essay as outline and answer all question. Please follow the “grading Rubric” to have a very good grade. Thanks
Eschatology Chart and Essay
=

Details:
Carefully read the following to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Access and complete the “Eschatology Chart.” Complete the chart according to the instructions provided in the chart resource.
Write an essay of 750-850 words that explains the significance of eschatology:
1.    Define and explain eschatology.
2.    Define and explain the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.
3.    Focus on one view of eschatology as covered in the textbook. Thoroughly explain the selected view.
4.    Support your position by referencing three to five academic resources, preferably from the GCU Library, including the Bible and the textbook. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Prepare this assignment submission as one Word document by copying and pasting the completed chart into your essay document following the References section.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
HTH359.R.EschatologyChart_3-31-14.doc

Follow this Rubric for a very good “Grade” .Thanks

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%     2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%     3
Satisfactory
75.00%     4
Good
85.00%     5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Define and explain eschatology.    Essay fails to define and explain eschatology.    Essay superficially defines and explains eschatology, lacks scholarly sources, biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay minimally defines and explains eschatology using some scholarly sources, but lacks biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay adequately defines and explains eschatology using some scholarly sources, appropriate biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay comprehensively defines and explains eschatology using relevant scholarly sources, appropriate biblical passages, and careful consideration of the readings.
30.0 % Define and explain the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.    Essay fails to provide a definition and explanation of the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.    Essay superficially defines and explains the theology of hope, but lacks examples to support definition.    Essay minimally defines and explains theology of hope citing only some examples to support definition.    Essay adequately defines and explains the theology of hope citing some examples to support definition.    Essay comprehensively defines and explains the theology of hope citing many appropriate and relevant examples to support definition.
30.0 % Explain one view of eschatology as covered in the textbook.    Essay fails to identify the view of eschatology covered in the textbook.    Essay superficially identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook, but lacks citations to support findings. Less than satisfactory explanation of the view is provided.    Essay minimally identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with some citations to support findings. Limited explanation of the view is provided.    Essay adequately identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with some accurate and relevant citations to support findings. Good explanation of the view is provided.    Essay extensively identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with many accurate and relevant citations to support findings. Thorough explanation of the view is provided.
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
6.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.    Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.    Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.    Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
6.0 % Argument Logic and Construction    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3.0 %Format
1.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.    All format elements are correct.
2.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)    No reference page is included. No citations are used. Less than three academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Less than three academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.    In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.
100 % Total Weightage

Eschatology Chart and Essay

This is the “Chart” But you might need to go to the link blow to see the full Chart.

Eschatology Chart

Eschatological View    Brief Explanation of View (2-3 Sentences)    Critique – State Your Position on the View (2-3 Sentences)
Biblical Passages to Support Position
Futurist Eschatology

Inaugurated
Eschatology

Realized Eschatology

Demythologization of Eschatology

Eschatology and Theology of Hope

Eschatology and Ethics

Dispensationalist Eschatology

Please follow the ‘Information blow. To get to the Chart there is a link blow.
Please do the essay as outline and answer all question. Please follow the “grading Rubric” to have a very good grade. Thanks
Eschatology Chart and Essay
=

Details:
Carefully read the following to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Access and complete the “Eschatology Chart.” Complete the chart according to the instructions provided in the chart resource.
Write an essay of 750-850 words that explains the significance of eschatology:
1.    Define and explain eschatology.
2.    Define and explain the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.
3.    Focus on one view of eschatology as covered in the textbook. Thoroughly explain the selected view.
4.    Support your position by referencing three to five academic resources, preferably from the GCU Library, including the Bible and the textbook. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Prepare this assignment submission as one Word document by copying and pasting the completed chart into your essay document following the References section.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
HTH359.R.EschatologyChart_3-31-14.doc

Follow this Rubric for a very good “Grade” .Thanks

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%     2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00%     3
Satisfactory
75.00%     4
Good
85.00%     5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content
20.0 % Define and explain eschatology.    Essay fails to define and explain eschatology.    Essay superficially defines and explains eschatology, lacks scholarly sources, biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay minimally defines and explains eschatology using some scholarly sources, but lacks biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay adequately defines and explains eschatology using some scholarly sources, appropriate biblical passages, and consideration of the readings.    Essay comprehensively defines and explains eschatology using relevant scholarly sources, appropriate biblical passages, and careful consideration of the readings.
30.0 % Define and explain the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.    Essay fails to provide a definition and explanation of the theology of hope as discussed in the readings.    Essay superficially defines and explains the theology of hope, but lacks examples to support definition.    Essay minimally defines and explains theology of hope citing only some examples to support definition.    Essay adequately defines and explains the theology of hope citing some examples to support definition.    Essay comprehensively defines and explains the theology of hope citing many appropriate and relevant examples to support definition.
30.0 % Explain one view of eschatology as covered in the textbook.    Essay fails to identify the view of eschatology covered in the textbook.    Essay superficially identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook, but lacks citations to support findings. Less than satisfactory explanation of the view is provided.    Essay minimally identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with some citations to support findings. Limited explanation of the view is provided.    Essay adequately identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with some accurate and relevant citations to support findings. Good explanation of the view is provided.    Essay extensively identifies the view of eschatology as covered in the textbook with many accurate and relevant citations to support findings. Thorough explanation of the view is provided.
17.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
6.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose    Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.    Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.    Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.    Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.    Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
6.0 % Argument Logic and Construction    Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.    Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.    Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.    Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.    Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)    Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.    Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.    Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.    Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.    Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3.0 %Format
1.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)    Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.    Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.    Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.    Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.    All format elements are correct.
2.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)    No reference page is included. No citations are used. Less than three academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Less than three academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.    Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.    In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Three to five academic sources used to support findings.
100 % Total Weightage