Topic: Family Law

Order Description
The Question is :
“There can be no question of this court altering the principle that it is the court and not any prior agreements between the parties that will determine the appropriate ancillary relief when a marriage comes to an end for that principle is embodied in the legislation.” Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42.
Critically evaluate the legal arguments for and against pre-nuptial agreements.

(Also could you please use only UK references such as journals, books and cases.)

Please follow the instructions of the attached question including correct referencing of Australian only cases and legislation – use footnotes and 6-9 references or more if you need.

I have also attached some other information I googled but DO NOT plagiarise as the paper will go through a plagiarism check – I have only supplied it as it may give you some help