icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

West Virginia University Infractions Review

West Virginia University Infractions Review

Order Description
West Virginia University Infractions Review
Review the NCAA decision regarding West Virginia University (WVU) infractions (NCAA, 2015). WVU was disciplined by the NCAA for recruiting violations, most of which the university claims were inadvertent and accidental. In fact, a compliance software program was allegedly responsible for some of the problems. The determination of the advantage the university may have gained, according to the panel, illustrates a remarkable gray area. The report states, “The panel determined that the institution gained more than a minimal, but less than a substantial or extensive recruiting advantage”. For your assignment this week, draft an argument, no more than one page, taking the position that this language either is, or is not, sufficient enough to create a measurable outcome that can be used in future cases.
Support your statements with evidence from the Required Studies and your research. Cite and reference your sources in APA style.
Click here for information on course rubrics.
References
NCAA. (2015). West Virginia University public infractions decision. Retrieved from https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/West%20Virginia%20Public%20Inf%20Decision.pdf

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

West Virginia University Infractions Review

West Virginia University Infractions Review

Order Description
West Virginia University Infractions Review
Review the NCAA decision regarding West Virginia University (WVU) infractions (NCAA, 2015). WVU was disciplined by the NCAA for recruiting violations, most of which the university claims were inadvertent and accidental. In fact, a compliance software program was allegedly responsible for some of the problems. The determination of the advantage the university may have gained, according to the panel, illustrates a remarkable gray area. The report states, “The panel determined that the institution gained more than a minimal, but less than a substantial or extensive recruiting advantage”. For your assignment this week, draft an argument, no more than one page, taking the position that this language either is, or is not, sufficient enough to create a measurable outcome that can be used in future cases.
Support your statements with evidence from the Required Studies and your research. Cite and reference your sources in APA style.
Click here for information on course rubrics.
References
NCAA. (2015). West Virginia University public infractions decision. Retrieved from https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/West%20Virginia%20Public%20Inf%20Decision.pdf

Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Comments are closed.

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes