List of all of your references you used in the project to date (you should have at least 12 at this point) and create an annotated bibliography. Basically, for this assignment, you will use your reference list, in alphabetical order, and provide a 2-4 sentence summary (brief!!) of what that reference said. This is a summary style document! Your grade will be based on your ability to BRIEFLY summarize the important points in the document as well as the strength of your reference materials. (i.e. if you used mainly low-level reference documents like encyclopedias, online dictionaries, anonymous articles, etc. this will negatively impact your grade.) A. Use of at least 12 references, properly annotated: 24 points (roughly 2 points each) B. Strength of references overall: 6 points (roughly .5 points each.) C. Use of one of the 5 Keller-approved citation methods  1- Bessette, G. (2004). Involving the community a guide to participatory development communication. Penang, Malaysia: Southbound. 2- Gualtieri, E. (n.d.). Kodak Modernism: Avant-Garde Poetry in the Age of Popular Photography. Modernist Cultures, 180-204. 3- Macknight, C. (n.d.). Kodak Photo CD Eastman Kodak Company Kodak Information Center Department E 343 State Street Rochester, NY 14650-0811. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 129-131. 4- Oracle changes the rules when licensing Oracle SE2. (n.d.). Retrieved October 9, 2015. 5- Plata, O. (1990). ACLE: A Software Package for SIMD Computer Simulation. The Computer Journal, 194-203. 6- Sellnow, T., & Seeger, M. (2013). Theorizing crisis communication. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. 7- Durling, J. (2000). Anatomy of a trade dispute: A documentary history of the Kodak -Fujifilm dispute. London: Cameron May. 8- Examples of Diagnostic Models. (n.d.). Learning to Change: A Guide for Organization Change Agents, 159-209. 9- Gualtieri, E. (n.d.). Kodak Modernism: Avant-Garde Poetry in the Age of Popular Photography. Modernist Cultures, 180-204. 10- Hamid, R., Ali, S., Reza, H., Arash, S., Ali, N., & Azizollah, A. (n.d.). The Analysis of Organizational Diagnosis on Based Six Box Model in Universities. Higher Education Studies. 11- SWOT Analysis. (n.d.). SpringerReference. 12- Fischer, B. There are No ‘Kodak Moments’, July, 2014. http://www.forbes.com/sites/billfischer/2014/07/04/there-are-no-kodak-moments/ 13- Menendez, J. Why Did Orcale Buy Sun? March, 2014. http://www.quora.com/Why-did-Oracle-buy-Sun

Annotated bibliography

This is a class on major author (Langston Hughes). Please read the whole parts of the project, you are free to choose the topic as long as there is available sources

Project: Conference-Length
Paper w/ Annotated Bib and Drafting

Part I: Annotated Bib, Due October 30th
Worth: 10%
An annotated bibliography of 10-15 sources, both primary and secondary. Please use MLA style and summarize and briefly analyze each source. Give more weight and time to those you find most compelling or helpful.

Part II: Proposal, Due November 18th
Worth: 5%
An approximately 2-page proposal addressing what your intervention will be into existing Hughes scholarship, including what approaches you might take in your paper or thesis.

Part III: Draft of Paper, Due December 4th
Worth: 10%
This should be a first draft of any length, beginning to solidify ideas that speak to the problem outlined in the proposal. At this point, an argument that can be supported in the final paper should be identified, and close reading should be brought in to support that argument. This will be graded on whether or not a solid, critically informed argument has been identified, and not on clarity, proofreading, or style. That is, it can be a reasonably messy draft, but should have solid ideas.

Part IV: Final Draft of Paper, due December 7 (final exam time)
Worth: 25%, 10-12 pages
Your argument should be clearly delineated at this point, and your critical intervention should be apparent. This draft should be polished. Part IV will be graded on whether or not your argument has, at this stage, made a solid, supported argument and made an intervention into the scholarship on your topic.

Annotated bibliography

This is a class on major author (Langston Hughes). Please read the whole parts of the project, you are free to choose the topic as long as there is available sources

Project: Conference-Length
Paper w/ Annotated Bib and Drafting

Part I: Annotated Bib, Due October 30th
Worth: 10%
An annotated bibliography of 10-15 sources, both primary and secondary. Please use MLA style and summarize and briefly analyze each source. Give more weight and time to those you find most compelling or helpful.

Part II: Proposal, Due November 18th
Worth: 5%
An approximately 2-page proposal addressing what your intervention will be into existing Hughes scholarship, including what approaches you might take in your paper or thesis.

Part III: Draft of Paper, Due December 4th
Worth: 10%
This should be a first draft of any length, beginning to solidify ideas that speak to the problem outlined in the proposal. At this point, an argument that can be supported in the final paper should be identified, and close reading should be brought in to support that argument. This will be graded on whether or not a solid, critically informed argument has been identified, and not on clarity, proofreading, or style. That is, it can be a reasonably messy draft, but should have solid ideas.

Part IV: Final Draft of Paper, due December 7 (final exam time)
Worth: 25%, 10-12 pages
Your argument should be clearly delineated at this point, and your critical intervention should be apparent. This draft should be polished. Part IV will be graded on whether or not your argument has, at this stage, made a solid, supported argument and made an intervention into the scholarship on your topic.