case analysis Order Description Case study Students will be given five important documents related to this case study of a person who experiences a major mental illness. Students will need to access these documents in order to complete this case study. ( I will upload the documents with the order) Students are expected to use the Case Study template to complete this case study. Students who do not use the template will receive a Zero F2 Grade. take note of the Marking guideAssignment structure: case analysis words 1800 2000 Follow the template to understand what to do. Read the 5 documents to understand the case analysis and write the assignment based on it. Write inside the table below. Step 3 and 6 required references. Use ANMC RN competency standards in step 4 you will find it with athe attachments. Step 3, 5 and 6 are important ,write 300 350 words in each 3, 5 and 6. Assessment 3 Case Study (Updated 2016) Using an Inquiry Based Learning ApproachLearning strategy What you need to do to critically analyse the Case Study Thought processes What you need to demonstrate to your lecturer in terms of your critical thinking about this Case Study Learning Outcomes Section Demonstrate your learning in each section by presenting the information that you have examined to improve your knowledge and understanding of this particular Case StudySTEP 1 CONNECTAnalyse each of the case study documents Think about what are some of the key issues or information that you consider are important in this Case Study?You do not need to write anything hereDocument what you consider are the key issues in this Case Study hereSTEP 2 QUESTIONWhat are some of the broader questions about this Case Study that you want to know more information about ?Identify the additional information you need to know Document your questions here1.2.3.4.5. Provide a rationale Why are these questions relevant to your learning about this Case Study? STEP 3 INVESTIGATEReview your current knowledge about the clients mental illness in this Case Study Research this disorder further. Record the resources you used to improve your knowledge of this mental illness below Answer the questions in the Learning Outcomes Section on the right Describe the disorder presented in this scenario include in-text referencingWhat are the clinical manifestations associated with this disorder? include in-text referencingWhat are the common treatment options for this disorder? include in-text referencing STEP 4 CONSTRUCTUsing a recovery and person-centred approach, explore the issues raised in this case study and how you can support this person during your early shift Consider the ANMC RN Competency StandardsYou do not need to write anything hereConsider the nursing interventions and clinical skills that are required for this Case StudyYou do not need to write anything hereConsider the patient safety concerns related to this Case StudyYou do not need to write anything hereIdentify the appropriate ANMC RN Competency Standards that would be applicable for you as an RN in supporting the person in this Case Study Provide an outline of how you would support this person during your shift Provide justification for your chosen interventions Identify the safety concerns for the patient in this Case Study STEPS 5 and 6Reflect on the parting comments made by the night duty RN STEP 5 EXPRESSDocument your thoughts about these comments made by the night duty RN below STEP 6 REFLECTProvide a justification for your thoughts using the professional literature to support your argument here include in-text referencing References Please include a list of all your references used in this case study Assessment 3 (Case Study) Feedback RubricLearning Strategy HD 85-100% D 75-84% C 65-74% P1 55-64% P2 50-54% F1 40-49% F2 0-39%Step 1 ConnectAnalysis of the case study documentsThe student has demonstrated a high level of critical analysis and synthesis of the key issues indicating original insightsThe student has demonstrated a critical analysis and synthesis of the key issues The student has demonstrated a detailed analysis of highly relevant key issues The student has provided an adequate identification of relevant key issues The student has identified some relevant key issues The student has identified key issues of limited relevance The student has not identified relevant key issuesStep 2 QuestionDeveloping critical questions about this Case StudyThe student has identified highly relevant questions with persuasive justifications demonstrating an exceptional level of understanding of the case study to stimulate their further learningThe student has identified highly relevant questions with thorough justifications demonstrating a sound understanding of the case study The student has identified relevant questions with appropriate justifications demonstrating a sound understanding of the case study The student has identified relevant questions and justification demonstrating a satisfactory level of understanding of the case study The student has identified some relevant questions and justification demonstrating a minimal level of understanding of the case studyThe student has identified inadequate questions with limited justification, demonstrating a lack of understanding of the case studyThe student has not identified relevant questionsStep 3 InvestigateDemonstration of further researchThe student has demonstrated an exceptionally high level of critical analysis and synthesis of the available literature The student has demonstrated a high level of analysis of the available literature The student has demonstrated a sound level of clinical knowledge and understanding The student has demonstrated a adequate level of clinical knowledge and understanding The student has demonstrated a minimal level of clinical knowledge and understandingThe student has demonstrated an inadequate level of clinical knowledge and understanding of the case study and care requirements The student has demonstrated a poor level of clinical knowledge and understanding of the case study and care requirements Learning Strategy HD 85-100% D 75-84% C 65-74% P1 55-64% P2 50-54% F1 40-49% F2 0-39%Step 4 ConstructLinking competencies Nursing skills and interventions Patient safety Competencies are specific Plan of care is exemplary of the recovery and person centred approach and is exceptionally well justified Safety concerns are specific Competencies are specific Plan of care encapsulates recovery and person centred approach and is very well justified Safety concerns are specific Competencies are identified at a satisfactory level Plan of care is accurate and clear with convincing justification Safety concerns are appropriate Competencies are adequately identified Plan of care is satisfactory with justification Safety concerns are appropriate Competencies are identified at a minimal level Plan of care is minimal with limited justification Safety concerns are identified Competencies are inadequately identified or are incorrect Plan of care is inadequate with little justification provided Safety concerns are inadequate Competencies are not identified Plan of care is not identified Justification not provided Safety concerns are not identifiedSteps 5 and 6 Express & ReflectProfessional reflection An exceptionally high level of professional reflection and synthesis of the available professional literature High level of professional reflection and analysis of the available professional literature Sound level of professional reflection and use of the professional literature Satisfactory level of professional reflection and justification using the professional literature Minimal level of professional reflection and justification using the professional literature Reflection is inadequate, justification is poorly supported using the professional literature Reflection is poor and not supported using the professional literatureREFERENCING AND ACADEMIC INTEGRITY Adherence to UniSA (2011) Harvard author-date system Extensive sources correctly referenced as per UniSA Harvard System Guidelines. No evidence of plagiarism Multiple sources correctly referenced as per UniSA Harvard System Guidelines. No evidence of plagiarism. Range of sources all correctly referenced as per UniSA Harvard System Guideline. No evidence of plagiarism Correct use of UniSA (2011) Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing, with no evidence of plagiarism. Reference list correctly written Mostly correct use of UniSA (2011) Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing, with no evidence of plagiarism. In-text referencing is insufficient. Reference list is incorrect or incomplete. OR some evidence of plagiarism. Possibly refer to AIO* Many statements not referenced. No reference list. OR evidence of extensive plagiarism Possibly refer to AIO*