write 2-3 paragraph according to those questions, no need to answer all of them.
What sorts of insights do John Caputo and Zygmunt Bauman give us into the moral demands made upon the whistle-blower? What is, according to Caputo, the nature of a moral dilemma? What, according to Bauman, is the problem with following conventions or rules when deliberating over whistle-blowing?
How does the thought of Hans Jonas differ from that of Caputo and Bauman? How would his thought be applied to the question of whistle-blowing?
How does human freedom or autonomy come into question in the thought of all of these thinkers?