1.Lay out and explain the distinction between an a prioriargument for the existence of God and an a posterioriargument for the existence of God and identify which type of argument the Ontological Argument is and which type of argument the Cosmological Argument is.

2.Fully lay out and explain Anselm’s version of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God.

3.Fully lay out and explain Descartes’s version of the Ontological Argument for the Existence of God.

4.Guanilo’s response to theOntological Argument is a reductio ad absurdumof the Ontological Argument. Lay out Guanilo’s argument, making sure to show how it is a reductio.

5.Lay out and explain Kant’s critique of the Ontological Argument.

6.Lay out the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God in terms of the notion of explanation.

7.Lay out Clarke’s version of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God in terms of the notion of contingency.

8.Lay out and explain the two halves ofthe Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) according to Rowe, and explain why Rowe claims that the Cosmological Argument won’t run without the truth of the PSR.

9.How have people traditionally argued for the truth of the PSR, and what does Rowe claim is wrong with these arguments?

10.Lay out and explain the Kalām Cosmological Argument, making sure to show how it is distinct from the traditional Cosmological Argument