already have the Contents, Introduction and Literature Review around 900 words. Can you try to follow the Contents and Introduction to finish the dissertation.

Skyscraper of London

History and Theory 3: Architectural Dissertation
Contents
Introduction

Literature Review

Chapter 1: History and Background
 History and background about St Paul Cathedral
 Rule about the protected views of St Paul Cathedral

Chapter 2: Case Studies
 The Shard
 One New Change
 One Canada Square

Chapter 3: Analysis and Comparison
 Compare of the urban planning
 Compare of the buildings
 Map and diagram

Conclusion

Illustration List

Reference
Introduction

This dissertation focuses on the skyscrapers of London. According to the website (Emporis 2015) New York, Chicago, Tokyo and Hong Kong have the most skyscrapers in the world. These four cities are from North America and Asia and most of skyscrapers are in North America and Asia. This mean most of the skyscrapers is not form Europe and also London, when people talk about skyscraper. (Emporis 2015) Actually London is the top 3 cities have the most skyscrapers in Europe. According to the website (LBC 2015) London also has the tallest building in Europe The Shard (309m) In London, most of the skyscrapers are in two areas The City of London and Canary Wharf. Michael (2008) stated that St Paul’s Cathedral is the most significant buildings of the world. This dissertation tries to find out how St Paul’s Cathedral affects the development of tall building in London.

The first chapter talks about the background and the history of high rise buildings and skyscrapers of London. It mainly focuses on St Paul’s Cathedral. As a major landmark of London, the UK government has planning policies to protect the views of St Paul’s Cathedral. Therefore, the first chapter also talks about this policy and the regulations that affect the development of tall buildings in London.

The second chapter has three case studies of tall buildings in London The Shard, One New Change and One Canada Square. These case studies focus on the outlook and style of the buildings. The Shard and One New Change are in the city of London and One Canada Square is built in Canary Wharf. These two areas are the key business districts of London. However, the skyscrapers of these areas have totally different style. These particular case studies have been selected to try and show the differences between tall buildings in The City of London and those in Canary Wharf. The chapter also discusses how the design of these buildings responds to the protected views of St Paul’s Cathedral.

The third chapter talks about the differences in urban planning between The City of London and Canary Wharf. The distribution of tall buildings in both areas is shown and the individual buildings. Compared to one anther. The strategic level response to views of St Paul’s Cathedral at an urban scale is shown.

Finally, the conclusion to this dissertation tries to establish how St Paul’s Cathedral affects the development of tall building in London? Is what the fact?
Literature Review

According to the Economist Newspaper (2014), for most of the 20th century, London was a low rise city and did not have much high rise structures. The tallest commercial building in Britain at the time was in Liverpool. The major reason why London had been a low rise city during that period was due to the London Plan, laid out by the mayor’s office. Sir Edward Lister, the capital’s head of planning decided that tall building can only be built in certain areas. This plan introduced included the concept of protecting the views of St Paul’s Cathedral and the Palace of Westminster. This policy has made the high rise building of city of London becomes dispersed pattern.

David (2014) states that, the existence of the St Paul’s Cathedral has intervened in the debate over Thomas Heatherwick’s Garden Bridge, obstructing the construction of the Garden Bridge. St Paul’s Cathedral council complained to Westminster council about how the Garden Bridge will block existing view of the St Paul’s Cathedral. Director of Caroe Architecture says if building of the Garden Bridge have been built this mean “there will be irreversible impacts on some of the most iconic views of St Paul’s Cathedral, to the detriment of our capital city.” And he also says that the application should be rejected because the Garden Bridge has not “adequately evidenced their own mitigation argument” over the damage to the views.

Lori (2015) claims that, because of the protect views policy no one can build something behind and near St Paul’s Cathedral. It will block the view from the riverside. London’s tallest building The Shard it’s bounded left and right by these protected views, but it sits just outside them. And also explains the odd shape of Leadenhall Building. The view of St Paul’s from Fleet Street had to be protected, and the tower ‘leaning back’ was enough to satisfy the planning committee

In summary of the literature, St Paul’s Cathedral affects The City of London. The protect views policy is the major reason. This policy affects the planning decide of The City of London. It let London has an odd city planning. Even the design of the buildings around St Paul’s Cathedral has been affect.
Reference

Emporis (2015) Retrieved from http://www.emporis.com/statistics/most-skyscraper-cities-worldwide

Emporis (2015) Retrieved from http://www.emporis.com/statistics/most-skyscrapers

LBC (2015) Retrieved from http://www.lbc.co.uk/revealed-new-skyscraper-to-rival-the-shard-121074

Michael Nitzschke (2008) Retrieved from
http://tourist-guide.biz/London/ChurchesCathedrals.html

Economist Newspaper (2014) Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21596539-capitals-skyline-growing-mess-let-boris-sort-it-out-ascent-city

David Rogers, 12 December 2014, Retrieved from http://www.building.co.uk/%E2%80%98garden-bridge-should-not-be-built%E2%80%99-says-furious-st-paul%E2%80%99s-cathedral/5072708.article

Lori Dorn, Contributing Editor at Laughing Squid, 23 June 2015, Retrieved from http://laughingsquid.com/the-historical-reason-that-explains-why-the-skyscrapers-of-london-are-so-oddly-shaped/

already have the Contents, Introduction and Literature Review around 900 words. Can you try to follow the Contents and Introduction to finish the dissertation.

Skyscraper of London

History and Theory 3: Architectural Dissertation
Contents
Introduction

Literature Review

Chapter 1: History and Background
 History and background about St Paul Cathedral
 Rule about the protected views of St Paul Cathedral

Chapter 2: Case Studies
 The Shard
 One New Change
 One Canada Square

Chapter 3: Analysis and Comparison
 Compare of the urban planning
 Compare of the buildings
 Map and diagram

Conclusion

Illustration List

Reference
Introduction

This dissertation focuses on the skyscrapers of London. According to the website (Emporis 2015) New York, Chicago, Tokyo and Hong Kong have the most skyscrapers in the world. These four cities are from North America and Asia and most of skyscrapers are in North America and Asia. This mean most of the skyscrapers is not form Europe and also London, when people talk about skyscraper. (Emporis 2015) Actually London is the top 3 cities have the most skyscrapers in Europe. According to the website (LBC 2015) London also has the tallest building in Europe The Shard (309m) In London, most of the skyscrapers are in two areas The City of London and Canary Wharf. Michael (2008) stated that St Paul’s Cathedral is the most significant buildings of the world. This dissertation tries to find out how St Paul’s Cathedral affects the development of tall building in London.

The first chapter talks about the background and the history of high rise buildings and skyscrapers of London. It mainly focuses on St Paul’s Cathedral. As a major landmark of London, the UK government has planning policies to protect the views of St Paul’s Cathedral. Therefore, the first chapter also talks about this policy and the regulations that affect the development of tall buildings in London.

The second chapter has three case studies of tall buildings in London The Shard, One New Change and One Canada Square. These case studies focus on the outlook and style of the buildings. The Shard and One New Change are in the city of London and One Canada Square is built in Canary Wharf. These two areas are the key business districts of London. However, the skyscrapers of these areas have totally different style. These particular case studies have been selected to try and show the differences between tall buildings in The City of London and those in Canary Wharf. The chapter also discusses how the design of these buildings responds to the protected views of St Paul’s Cathedral.

The third chapter talks about the differences in urban planning between The City of London and Canary Wharf. The distribution of tall buildings in both areas is shown and the individual buildings. Compared to one anther. The strategic level response to views of St Paul’s Cathedral at an urban scale is shown.

Finally, the conclusion to this dissertation tries to establish how St Paul’s Cathedral affects the development of tall building in London? Is what the fact?
Literature Review

According to the Economist Newspaper (2014), for most of the 20th century, London was a low rise city and did not have much high rise structures. The tallest commercial building in Britain at the time was in Liverpool. The major reason why London had been a low rise city during that period was due to the London Plan, laid out by the mayor’s office. Sir Edward Lister, the capital’s head of planning decided that tall building can only be built in certain areas. This plan introduced included the concept of protecting the views of St Paul’s Cathedral and the Palace of Westminster. This policy has made the high rise building of city of London becomes dispersed pattern.

David (2014) states that, the existence of the St Paul’s Cathedral has intervened in the debate over Thomas Heatherwick’s Garden Bridge, obstructing the construction of the Garden Bridge. St Paul’s Cathedral council complained to Westminster council about how the Garden Bridge will block existing view of the St Paul’s Cathedral. Director of Caroe Architecture says if building of the Garden Bridge have been built this mean “there will be irreversible impacts on some of the most iconic views of St Paul’s Cathedral, to the detriment of our capital city.” And he also says that the application should be rejected because the Garden Bridge has not “adequately evidenced their own mitigation argument” over the damage to the views.

Lori (2015) claims that, because of the protect views policy no one can build something behind and near St Paul’s Cathedral. It will block the view from the riverside. London’s tallest building The Shard it’s bounded left and right by these protected views, but it sits just outside them. And also explains the odd shape of Leadenhall Building. The view of St Paul’s from Fleet Street had to be protected, and the tower ‘leaning back’ was enough to satisfy the planning committee

In summary of the literature, St Paul’s Cathedral affects The City of London. The protect views policy is the major reason. This policy affects the planning decide of The City of London. It let London has an odd city planning. Even the design of the buildings around St Paul’s Cathedral has been affect.
Reference

Emporis (2015) Retrieved from http://www.emporis.com/statistics/most-skyscraper-cities-worldwide

Emporis (2015) Retrieved from http://www.emporis.com/statistics/most-skyscrapers

LBC (2015) Retrieved from http://www.lbc.co.uk/revealed-new-skyscraper-to-rival-the-shard-121074

Michael Nitzschke (2008) Retrieved from
http://tourist-guide.biz/London/ChurchesCathedrals.html

Economist Newspaper (2014) Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21596539-capitals-skyline-growing-mess-let-boris-sort-it-out-ascent-city

David Rogers, 12 December 2014, Retrieved from http://www.building.co.uk/%E2%80%98garden-bridge-should-not-be-built%E2%80%99-says-furious-st-paul%E2%80%99s-cathedral/5072708.article

Lori Dorn, Contributing Editor at Laughing Squid, 23 June 2015, Retrieved from http://laughingsquid.com/the-historical-reason-that-explains-why-the-skyscrapers-of-london-are-so-oddly-shaped/