Womens role in todays society
I. Introduction (____/20%)
Typically, the introduction is short (less than 10% of the word length) and you should:
Name the work being reviewed as well as the date it was created and the name of the author/creator.
Describe the main argument or purpose of the work.
Explain the context in which the work was created. This could include the social or political context, the place of the work in a creative or academic tradition, or the relationship between the work and the creators life experience.
Have a concluding sentence that signposts what your evaluation of the work will be. For instance, it may indicate whether it is a positive, negative, or mixed evaluation.
II. Summary (____/20%)
Briefly summarize the main points and objectively describe how the creator portrays these by using techniques, styles, media, characters or symbols. This summary should not be the focus of the critique and is usually shorter than the critical evaluation.
III. Critical evaluation (____/40%)
This section should give a systematic and detailed assessment of the different elements of the work, evaluating how well the creator was able to achieve the purpose through these. For example: you would assess the plot structure, characterization and setting of a novel; an assessment of a painting would look at composition, brush strokes, color and light; a critique of a research project would look at subject selection, design of the experiment, analysis of data and conclusions. A critical evaluation does not simply highlight negative impressions. It should deconstruct the work and identify both strengths and weaknesses. It should examine the work and evaluate its success, in light of its purpose.
Pick any 2 of these elements and develop into 2 body paragraphs: Examples of key critical questions that could help your assessment include:
Who is the creator? Is the work presented objectively or subjectively?
What are the aims of the work? Were the aims achieved?
What techniques, styles, media were used in the work? Are they effective in portraying the purpose?
What types of evidence or persuasion are used? Has evidence been interpreted fairly?
How is the work structured? Does it favor a particular interpretation or point of view? Is it effective?
Does the work enhance understanding of key ideas or theories? Does the work engage (or fail to engage) with key concepts or other works in its discipline?
OR: Simply describe the strengths of the article in one paragraph and the weaknesses in the another using any of the above mentioned items.
This evaluation is written in formal academic style and logically presented. Group and order your ideas into paragraphs. Start with the broad impressions first and then move into the details of the technical elements. For shorter critiques, you may discuss the strengths of the works, and then the weaknesses.
To support the evaluation, provide evidence from the work itself, such as a quote or example. Explain how this evidence supports your evaluation of the work.
IV. Conclusion (____/20%)
This is usually a very brief paragraph, which includes:
A statement indicating the overall evaluation of the work
In some circumstances, recommendations for improvement on the work may be appropriate.
A description of who you feel would greatly benefit from reading this work.Need aProfessionalWriter to Work on this Paper?