icon

Usetutoringspotscode to get 8% OFF on your first order!

Does the idea of Europe Studies (or even European history) make sense, or is Europe better understood as a collection of subcultures (protestant and Catholic, northern, Alpine, and Mediterranean, east and west, rich and poor, Slavic, Germanic, and Latin, EU/non-EU, etc.) with individual histories?

This is an 800 or more word essay prompt exam:Background: Surveys of European history seem inevitably to focus on Britain, France and Germany (and perhaps occasionally Italy, Russia/USSR, etc.), with the rest of Europe only making occasional cameo appearances-this course on Europe Studies has probably been no exception. Eastern Europe in particular seems to suffer. Norman Daviess Vanished Kingdoms, on the other hand, makes a compelling case for integrating the histories of half-forgotten Europe into a a broader picture of the continents past, with particular attention given, esp. in (relatively) recent centuries, to Easter Europe.Question: Does the idea of Europe Studies (or even European history) make sense, or is Europe better understood as a collection of subcultures (protestant and Catholic, northern, Alpine, and Mediterranean, east and west, rich and poor, Slavic, Germanic, and Latin, EU/non-EU, etc.) with individual histories?Responses must consider at least three separate chapters of Norman Daviess Vanished Kingdoms, and must address whether unique and longstanding Slavic traditions in eastern Europe (or, more recently, the intense influence of the USSR) undercut the European identity of any states or regions.Successful responses will employ clear definitions, analytical comparisons, and specific evidence (lectures, primary sources, Davies, etc.).

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress | Designed by: Premium WordPress Themes | Thanks to Themes Gallery, Bromoney and Wordpress Themes