This week we saw that Amartya Sen and Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im discussed the importance of a secular democracy and a secular state. Na’im argues that a secular state is a means to the end of being religious. He even says that as a Muslim he needs the state to be secular. However, in the United States there are many conservative politicians arguing the opposite; religion needs to be woven into the fabric of our secular democracy. Many in this country who would argue against the separation of church and state would be appalled by any argument suggesting that Islam play a role in our politics.
In your opinion, should religion play any role in our democracy or do you agree with An-Na’im that the state should remain secular in order to benefit religious practice? Explain why or why not.
Given our readings for the week, where do women and minorities fit in this conversation about religion and the state? Explain.
There is no simple one or two sentence answer to the questions; be detailed and include references if applicable.