AN ETHICAL ISSUE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY THROUGH THE LENSES OF TWO ETHICAL THEORISTS
PRESENT AN ETHICAL ISSUE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY THROUGH THE LENSES OF TWO ETHICAL THEORISTS. WRITE AN ANALYTICAL ESSAY OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT PAGES LONG.
1) EXPLAIN AN ETHICAL ISSUE IN THE COMMUNITY
2) OUTLINE THE MAIN ARGUMENTS AND FEATURES OF TWO ETHICAL THEORISTS
3) ANALIZE THE COMMUNITIE?S ETHICAL ISSUE USING THE TWO CHOSEN ETHICAL THEORISTS
4) CONSTRUCT A DEBATE BETWEEN THE TWO THEORISTS, ALLOWING THEM TO CRITIQUE AND RESPOND TO EACH OTHER
5) APPRAISE WHICH THEORIST BEST RESOLVES THE EHHICAL ISSUE
6) PREDICT WHAT OUTCOMES WOULD RESULT FROM EACH ETHICAL THERORST?S SOLUTION

MUST CONTAIN FOUR GENERAL COMPONENTS
1) DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THE ETHICAL ISSUE. WHO ARE THE KEY INDIVIDUALS, ORGANIZATIONS, SOCIAL GROUPS, STAKE HOLDERS INVOLVED. WHAT COMPETING VALUES/ PRIORITES GIVE THE ISSUE ETHICAL VALENCE.
2) A CLEAR EXPOSITION OF THE TWO THEORISTS? MAIN ARGUMENTS. WHAT ARE THE MAIN PRIORITIES OF THE TWO ETHESISTS. WHAT DO THEY BELIEVE ARE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF ETHICAL REASONING. HOW DO THEY DEVELOP AND DEPLOY ARGUMENTS?
3) INCLUDE AN IN-DEPTH APPLICATION OF THE THEORIES OUTLINED IN #2 AS IT PERTAINS TO THE ETHICAL QUESTION CHOSEN IN #1. HOW WOULD EACH THEORIST RESPOND TO THE ETHICAL QUESTION? HOW WOULD THEY CRITIQUE OR REFUTE ONE ANOTHER? CONSTRUCT THIS AS A DEBATE, ALLOWING THE THEORISTS TO RESPOND TO ONE ANOTHER.
4) INCLUDE AN ASSESSMENT OF WHICH THEORIST IS BEST ABLE TO ADDRESS THE ETHICAL PROBLEM. WHY IS ONE THEORY MORE RELIABLE THAN ANOTHER? WHAT POSITIVE OUTCOMES COULD BE ANTICIPATED BASED ON THE MORE RELIABLE THEORIST? WHAT NEGATIVE OUTCOMES MIGHT BE ANTICIPATED BASED ON THE LESS RELIABLE THEORIST? THERE MUST BE A LOGICAL ARGUMENT FOR WHY ONE THEORY IS MORE RATIONALLY JUSTIFIABLE THAN THE OTHER.

AN ETHICAL ISSUE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY THROUGH THE LENSES OF TWO ETHICAL THEORISTS
PRESENT AN ETHICAL ISSUE WITHIN THE COMMUNITY THROUGH THE LENSES OF TWO ETHICAL THEORISTS. WRITE AN ANALYTICAL ESSAY OF APPROXIMATELY EIGHT PAGES LONG.
1) EXPLAIN AN ETHICAL ISSUE IN THE COMMUNITY
2) OUTLINE THE MAIN ARGUMENTS AND FEATURES OF TWO ETHICAL THEORISTS
3) ANALIZE THE COMMUNITIE?S ETHICAL ISSUE USING THE TWO CHOSEN ETHICAL THEORISTS
4) CONSTRUCT A DEBATE BETWEEN THE TWO THEORISTS, ALLOWING THEM TO CRITIQUE AND RESPOND TO EACH OTHER
5) APPRAISE WHICH THEORIST BEST RESOLVES THE EHHICAL ISSUE
6) PREDICT WHAT OUTCOMES WOULD RESULT FROM EACH ETHICAL THERORST?S SOLUTION

MUST CONTAIN FOUR GENERAL COMPONENTS
1) DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THE ETHICAL ISSUE. WHO ARE THE KEY INDIVIDUALS, ORGANIZATIONS, SOCIAL GROUPS, STAKE HOLDERS INVOLVED. WHAT COMPETING VALUES/ PRIORITES GIVE THE ISSUE ETHICAL VALENCE.
2) A CLEAR EXPOSITION OF THE TWO THEORISTS? MAIN ARGUMENTS. WHAT ARE THE MAIN PRIORITIES OF THE TWO ETHESISTS. WHAT DO THEY BELIEVE ARE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF ETHICAL REASONING. HOW DO THEY DEVELOP AND DEPLOY ARGUMENTS?
3) INCLUDE AN IN-DEPTH APPLICATION OF THE THEORIES OUTLINED IN #2 AS IT PERTAINS TO THE ETHICAL QUESTION CHOSEN IN #1. HOW WOULD EACH THEORIST RESPOND TO THE ETHICAL QUESTION? HOW WOULD THEY CRITIQUE OR REFUTE ONE ANOTHER? CONSTRUCT THIS AS A DEBATE, ALLOWING THE THEORISTS TO RESPOND TO ONE ANOTHER.
4) INCLUDE AN ASSESSMENT OF WHICH THEORIST IS BEST ABLE TO ADDRESS THE ETHICAL PROBLEM. WHY IS ONE THEORY MORE RELIABLE THAN ANOTHER? WHAT POSITIVE OUTCOMES COULD BE ANTICIPATED BASED ON THE MORE RELIABLE THEORIST? WHAT NEGATIVE OUTCOMES MIGHT BE ANTICIPATED BASED ON THE LESS RELIABLE THEORIST? THERE MUST BE A LOGICAL ARGUMENT FOR WHY ONE THEORY IS MORE RATIONALLY JUSTIFIABLE THAN THE OTHER.